That transferring sensitive data via a device (like a hard drive) in a cardboard box (like a bankers box) is highly susceptible to promoting disk failure?
That just because someone says they are Unicode compliant, doesn’t necessarily mean they can truly handle foreign language data?
That your law firms’s litigation support department, if you have one, can add tremendous value (most likely) to your case if brought to the table at the beginning of discovery?
That TruCrypt encryption can be applied to a full disk on a hard drive, or just to a small container that can be FTP’d?
That hard drives can deteriorate in a few years if not used, because the disks need to spin?
That copying 5GB of tiny files is much slower than copying 1 large 5GB file?
That most indexing tools do NOT perform OCR (optical character recognition) on flat documents during indexing, thus those documents are not searchable?
That a standard DVD-R single layer can only hold ~4.7GB of information and takes ~30minutes to fully burn, whereas copying 4.7GB of files to a hard drive will only take 5 minutes?
That a PST file from Microsoft Outlook 2002 or earlier cannot exceed 2GB in size, otherwise it will be corrupted?
That all Microsoft Office document formats can contain embedded files and that those files too can contain embedded files?
That Mozilla Thunderbird emails can be easily processed by most eDiscovery applications?
That many of the off-the-shelf eDiscovery programs can only extract a limited number of embedded files?
That if you redact a document, you should re-OCR the document before producing the text of that document?
That search terms generally miss over 50% of would-be relevant content according to TREC?
That lots of useful and searchable content is missed by search engines because they do NOT perform OCR on the documents?